YOUR MATTRESS?
As more people search for ways to improve their health and lessen their impact on the Earth, different areas of life are explored for change. One area getting a lot of attention these days is the bedroom, specifically the mattresses we all take for granted.
For the past fifty years, the traditional innerspring mattress has been gaining in popularity. Coils have been added, changes have been made in the design and make-up of the layers of padding and ticking, and certainly marketing techniques have been finely honed. But what exactly is in that mattress?
MARKETING MAYHEM
In principle, all innerspring mattresses are the same. There is a network of steel springs encased in a cage, and this cage is surrounded by 1 to 5 layers of padding, with a final outside case of fabric stitched shut, holding all the insides together. The differences lie in the type and thickness of the steel springs, how many springs/coils (and their diameter), the softness or firmness and make-up of the padding, and the decorativeness of the ticking. For example, two mattresses that differ in components by 10 - 15% may differ in price by $2000.
Several issues have been raised by those who have sought to explore the behind-the-scenes elements of traditional mattresses. The most obvious is the lowest price claims made by mattress retailers. For example, several competing retailers in the same town can all say "If you can find this mattress at a lower price, we will give you $500!" How is this possible? The answer is that a mattress manufacturer may only make 3 or 4 different mattresses , but use 250 different labels. So, a Sealy factory, as an example, would make 500 of the same mattresses in a day, and sew labels on the first 100 that say BeautyRest Extempo and ship them to Dial-A-Mattress, sew a different label on the next 100 that say BeautyRest Exculsior and ship them to Sleepy's across the street, sew yet a third label on the next 100 that says BeautyRest Excalibur and ship them to Macy's, the fourth 100 labeled BeautyRest Exprimo for KleinSleep, and the fifth 100 labeled BeautyRest Exposition for Rockaway Bedding. This would be called the EX series, sold exclusively for what price each retailer wished, because the fact is, you could not find the Extempo anywhere but Dial-A-Mattress, for any price. Indeed, they could offer you $1MM to find the same mattress with a lower price, you never could. Same mattress, different label.
When the manufacturer ran out of EX names, or took on another big customer with similar marketing techniques, the ticking could be changed. For example, the ticking is the very thin piece of fabric on the outside and it usually has a decorative pattern sewn in. If the EX series had triangles for the pattern, Sealy can make 500 more mattresses that day, but make the pattern with wavy lines. The same mattress with wavy lines can now be the SU series, for the Suprema, Supressa, Suparta, Sucana, and the Sumesa. Indeed, the ticking can even be pink instead of beige, creating the OP series and the WA series. Only this time, the OP and WA are sold in higher end stores with price tags from $1000 to $1500, instead of the $500 to $1000 for the EX and the SU. Yes still, the same mattress, but twenty labels, two patterns and two colors. And of course, Serta, King Koil, and hundreds of others can turn out basically the same mattress as Sealy, with their own labels.
Obviously, the possibilities are endless, with minor changes opening up great opportunities. And for some people, these changes can even be noticeable. True changes like sewing an extra layer of cotton on top and calling it ‘pillow top' (for $500 more) is all the rage, as is genuinely changing the size and number of the springs. So, in visiting several stores and in laying oneself down on several mattresses, you may discover differences. But there are some things that are true of all mattresses, no matter who made them.
DANGER AHEAD
All mattresses in the US must pass a very stringent test call FF-472, which is a flammability test created by the CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission, a Federal Agency.) There are no laws specifying what may go into a mattress, or what may not (?) The only requirement is that a lighted Pall Mall cigarette, when placed on a mattress, must not produce a char mark greater than 1" from where the cigarette was originally placed. (If the cigarette goes out, it is relighted, and this is done with 40 different cigarettes in 40 different places on the mattress.) If a prototype mattress passes this test, it is deemed fit for sale in the US.
If a mattress sold in the US is ever found to not be able to pass this test, there are very severe penalties and recalls are imposed. The ramifications of a Sealy or a Simmons mattress, for example, found to be the cause of a fire death, would be devastating. So one thing is perfectly clear and very consistent. No way, no how, all marketing gimmicks aside, would a mattress manufacturer allow their mattresses to be able to burn. (Since each model available for sale must have a prototype tested, an arduous process, you can understand the true origin of having the same mattress with a variety of labels.)
Now, there are no restrictions on how this non-flammability is achieved, nor are there any restrictions on whether the mattress can melt or give off black toxic gases when exposed to the cigarette. As well, there are no restrictions on specifically what materials may be used to prevent the char mark. In this country, and around the world, products are used until someone finds a problem with them. For example, asbestos was one of the most widely used components in constructing buildings for most of the twentieth century. It was only in the 1980s that it was discovered to be toxic. The same goes for lead in house paint. The EPA does not test mattresses for toxicity, nor does the FDA. The CPSC is alone in mattress testing, and their concern is to avoid flammability at any cost. So it would not surprise anyone following this issue if it were discovered in 2008 that Serta's favorite mattress component had 100 times the toxicity of asbestos.
Those in the natural bedding business are trying to get additional safety laws passed, but the FDA really only deals with substances that are consumed, and the EPA focuses on the water, Earth, and air at large, but not household products. There is no federal agency to turn toward, and the lobbying efforts of the mattress manufacturers are well funded. There is a possibility, though, for the CPSC to take up this matter, as part of a larger flammability of furniture issue.
Testing labs have put mice in cages with typical mattress components and published the results. ABC News in NY and Philadelphia have broadcast stories on some of these tests and have reported that the response of the mice ranged from becoming catatonic to sudden death. Anecdotal evidence of nausea, headaches, dizziness, and over all poor health have been observed in humans sleeping on traditional chemical and spring mattresses, but patterns have been hard to draw, since there are so many different models of mattresses. For example, even if two co-workers were to mention their common nausea while talking around the water cooler AND the issue came up that each had just bought a new mattress, the fact that one had a Serta Perfect Sleeper Assante and the other had a KleinSleep house-brand Primo, the connection would be dismissed right there. (While it was, in fact, exactly the same mattress.)
SIDS AND MATTRESSES
The most troubling element has been discussed in the UK and its markets, but not here in the States. In 1992, TOMY, a toy company, funded a study in the UK on the toxicity of mattresses and its links to crib death (called SIDS in the US.) That study found a direct correlation and determined that, in fact, the components used in mattresses in the UK were the causal factor in hundreds of crib deaths in the UK and its markets (New Zealand, Australia, former British colonies, etc.) One of the components commonly used, for example, was arsenic. Every mattress produced in the UK was pulled off the shelves of stores and all mattress makers changed the components that they used. Since that time, crib death (SIDS) has decreased demonstrably in those markets.
It should be pointed out that in, for example, Japan (where mattresses are made of only cotton), SIDS is "no problem", as noted in the research report. Indeed, SIDS/crib death has only been observed in the West (US, Europe, etc.) and only in the last half century. The advent of chemical compounds taking the place of natural fibers and materials has brought many changes, including negative ones, to many areas of daily life and mattresses are not alone.
The health effects of sleeping on a traditional chemical and springs mattress are joined by environmental effects of these mattresses simply being produced. In order to produce steel springs, iron ore must be harvested from the Earth in a process akin to strip mining. That iron ore is then smelted to create steel and the smelting process requires great heat and then cooling. That heat is almost always generated by coal, which itself requires Earth-destructive strip mining. And of course, burning coal by the thousands of tons is one of the primary causes of the acid rain and sulphur clouds that hang over parts of the eastern US. As well, cooling steel also requires great amounts of water, and that is why the ferrous content (iron) in the water is so high in these areas. Now, no one is likely to stop using steel altogether tomorrow, but the question that must be asked is, do we need steel in our mattresses? Do we need chemical padding that may be causing us nausea and headaches and perhaps killing our children?
The natural fiber mattress proponents have been gaining supporters as information like this has spread. And in turn, what was once cottage industries of futon makers, has grown to a very large portion of the mattress business. Unfortunately, as anything becomes popular, profit-making eclipses good sense and corporate behavior starts to dominate. Twenty years ago, as awareness of the dangers of traditional mattresses starting growing, a fast solution was to seek a futon store. Based on the Japanese bedroll shikibuton, the American futon was just a thicker version, still flexible, but hardly small enough to roll up and stick in a cabinet as the Japan do every morning. As crafted twenty years ago, the futon was soft to the touch, so that it shaped itself to every contour of the sleeper's body, but the density of layer upon layer of cotton produced a support system that was firm and therefore outstanding orthopedically. (Chances are, your chiropractor sleeps on an old, all-cotton futon.) Today's super premium mattress from traditional manufacturers are in fact efforts to duplicate the natural properties of an all cotton futon. A simple cotton mattress will provide just the right support where needed, while typical spring mattresses must use springs of uniform tension. For prices above $2000, Serta, etc. offer mattresses that have springs of different tension in different parts of the mattress, and then sew a layer of plain cotton right on top of the chemical pads. In fact, for more than $4000, Duxiana will put an entire good quality cotton futon (not just a layer of cotton) and combine it with a box spring. The deception is that if you can still find a handmade, all-cotton futon, your back and your health (and our Earth) will be a lot happier and you will only be out $200 - $300.
Therein lies the rub, though. In its true form, the American version of the cotton futon was a return to what mattresses had been for centuries. Prior to the early 1900s, all mattresses were made with natural fibers - horsehair, wool, feathers, cotton, etc. In the same way that cotton was replaced with polyester for clothing, chemical pads and steel replaced it in bedding. As futons gained popularity in the 1980s and 1990s for their flexibility (which allowed them to be used for combination couch/beds) traditional manufacturers (including the big mattress makers) started making ‘futons' that were just flexible mattresses of the same chemical pads found in traditional spring mattresses! In fact, there are even ‘innerspring futons' for sale now! And of course, these ‘futon' mattresses were being made by the thousands in factories, using the same energy-hungry, polluting machinery used to make ‘traditional' mattresses.
SOLUTIONS AND PEACE OF MIND
There are still many small workshops in the US, making futons by hand out of cotton and wool. (Wool has no effect on support, but provides a luxury ‘feel'.) And for those who want to support organic farming, there are organic cotton futons for about 3 - 4 times the price of one made with ‘green' cotton, which is still a lot less expensive than most spring mattresses and a lot better for your health.
(It should be noted that the difference to the sleeper's health between a futon made with green cotton and organic cotton is insignificant. Green cotton is grown conventionally, with pesticides, but then no further processing takes place, like bleaching and heavy metal dyeing. The pesticides are sprayed on the outside of the plant before the boll opens, so the evils of pesticide use are its effect on the water we drink and the air we breathe. Sleeping on green cotton, like wearing green cotton clothing, is no less safe than sleeping on organic cotton. Buying organic cotton clothing and organic cotton futons is a vote with your wallet that you would like all cotton farmers to go organic. That is a financial and political statement, though, and not a health choice, like eating organically grown food. It should be further noted that a futon crafted from green cotton is an environmental statement all by itself, as most small crafters use cotton that is ‘waste cotton', the fibers from the cotton boll that are unusable for thread and fabric, as well as the scrap from mills. In the same way that pre-consumer waste paper that is made into new paper is termed ‘recycled', most small futon crafters use ‘recycled' cotton, which is just reclaimed waste from the entire cotton industry. Imagine making a zero pollution automobile entirely out of the peanut shells that Planters throws away each day. That is the reclaimed waste principle behind green cotton futons.)
There are also some hybrid products available. For those who absolutely must have springs, there are inner spring mattresses made by natural fiber companies with steel springs, surrounded by green cotton or by organic cotton. It is important to note that the latter would not be considered an ‘organic' mattress, though, as it is primarily steel, which is not an organic product. As well, in addressing the converting couch market, many of the small handcrafters of futons have made versions with a layer of environmentally-friendly foam. These, too, are not all-natural or all-organic, but they address the needs and desires of a marketplace that would be purchasing all-bad products otherwise.
All in all, panic is not necessary as a response to what is just now becoming public knowledge about mattresses and their effect on our health, that of our children and on our Earth. There are healthful alternatives available and in the age of the web, they are just a click away.
Written by: Theodore Casparian, White Lotus Home
RELATED LINKS:
|
|---|
| * * * IN-HOUSE RESOURCES * * * |
|---|
